Search for: "QUI DOE" Results 1 - 20 of 1,396
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2017, 2:32 pm by Gregory J. Brod
The defendant is not even served yet, so it likely does not know there is a suit filed against it unless there are quiet rumblings or leaks. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 10:43 am by admin
Not only does this type of fraud waste massive amounts of taxpayer dollars, [...] [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 7:00 am by Gregory J. Brod
Continue reading The post SCOTUS Rules Seal Violation Does Not Cause Automatic Dismissal of Qui Tam Case appeared first on Healthcare Fraud Lawyer Blog. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 7:00 am by Gregory J. Brod
Continue Reading The post SCOTUS Rules Seal Violation Does Not Cause Automatic Dismissal of Qui Tam Case appeared first on San Francisco Injury Lawyer Blog. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 10:32 am by Nick Robinson
Although qui tam suits are for civil damages this does not preclude the government from bringing criminal charges against those implicated in a qui tam lawsuit.3. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 6:57 pm by A. Brian Albritton
In short, the Second Circuit does not really explain why this violation of law concerning a lawyer's duty not to disclose client confidences warrants dismissal of a qui tam when compared with other violations of law by relators.A. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 5:04 pm by Gregory J. Brod
Additionally, while the statute does not bar governmental employees from bringing a False Claims Act (FCA) suit, governmental employees wishing to bring an FCA suit should be prepared to respond to challenges that he or she cannot bring suit as a governmental employee. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Geoff Schweller
The FCA’s qui tam provisions allow whistleblowers to file the lawsuits on behalf of the government. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:03 pm by A. Brian Albritton
”  Acknowledging that the defendant sought dismissal without prejudice to the Government,  the Court stated that it was bound by the plain language of § 3730(b)(1) which “requires the Attorney’s General’s written consent to a qui tam action’s dismissal and does make a distinction on whether the dismissal is without prejudice to the Government’s interest. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 11:21 am by Geoff Schweller
While the bill does not address the DOJ’s dismissal authority, whistleblower advocates claim the law will improve the efficacy of the FCA in holding fraudsters accountable. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:20 am by The Docket Navigator
The court granted defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's qui tam false marking claim "on the ground that the qui tam provision of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 11:48 am by Lauren Aversa
Once a party files a suit, does the False Claim Act’s “first-to-file” rule bar all subsequent suits based on similar facts indefinitely or only while the initial suit is pending before a court? [read post]
27 May 2013, 7:22 pm by A. Brian Albritton
Wash.), which addressed insurance coverage for a qui tam settlement: “False Claims Act Qui Tam Action Over Billing Practices Does Not Involve Professional Services; Claim Is Barred by Fraud Exclusion. [read post]